<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libertarian paternalism, or: Gov&#8217;t out of my idiocy!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnborland.com/2009/11/12/liberal-paternalism-or-govt-out-of-my-idiocy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnborland.com/2009/11/12/liberal-paternalism-or-govt-out-of-my-idiocy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.johnborland.com/2009/11/12/liberal-paternalism-or-govt-out-of-my-idiocy/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnborland.com/?p=384#comment-163</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed this. Behavioral Economics is snarky name for what&#039;s essentially a psychological critique of classical economics, which still claims to track &quot;rational&quot; human behavior. All goes to show that econ is just as much a &quot;fuzzy&quot; social science as a &quot;hard&quot; natural one like, say, biology or physics. But goodness knows classical econ is overdue for a good critique or three these days. Have you seen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=the-trap&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Trap&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this. Behavioral Economics is snarky name for what&#8217;s essentially a psychological critique of classical economics, which still claims to track &#8220;rational&#8221; human behavior. All goes to show that econ is just as much a &#8220;fuzzy&#8221; social science as a &#8220;hard&#8221; natural one like, say, biology or physics. But goodness knows classical econ is overdue for a good critique or three these days. Have you seen <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=the-trap" rel="nofollow">The Trap</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

